Equipment / particulate food
A food containing pieces needs a review of both the liquid phase and the particles. Tube-in-tube passage geometry may suit selected pumpable formulations, but particle size alone cannot establish process suitability. Include the full distribution, concentration, shape and quality expectations.
Configuration priorities
Record particle dimensions along three axes, hardness, concentration and fibre length. Check the feed pump, valves, returns and outlet as well as the heating tube. A generous passage in one section does not remove restrictions elsewhere in the package.
Passing through the machine and receiving the required process are different questions. Particle heating and residence-time behaviour need to be included in the product-specific process assessment. The process authority should define the validation basis for the worst-case formulation and operating condition.
Share the shape and texture that should remain after processing. Pump choice, shear, pressure and handling stages can influence particle integrity. Representative trials may be needed before committing to a configuration; do not treat a nominal maximum size as a performance guarantee.
A useful first enquiry
You do not need every value to start. Share what is known and identify what needs review. A clear product brief helps define configuration, included modules and the decisions that affect the quotation.
Practical answers
No. Pumpability, passage, heat transfer, residence time and the established thermal process must all be compatible.
Send particle measurements, formulation, carrier viscosity, intended throughput and the required condition after processing. Mark unknown values clearly.
Discuss your equipment
Send your product, target flow and packaging needs. The equipment quotation should identify what is included, what connects to your existing line and which process values still need confirmation.
Start your equipment enquiry